Just wondering what you all have heard, do you think it's an urban legend that bottoming an older master cyl completly when bleeding brakes could lead to seal failure? It makes sense I guess, that the section of the bore that isn't normally used could build up some surface rust or some such gunk and chew up the seal when you bottom it out.

If there is some truth to it, are we talking about REALLY old neglected systems, or is it something to think about a normally maintained street car? Certianly something I shouldn't worry about on my frequently bled track car with fairly new master cyl right? ....RIGHT?

Discuss

If anyone is interested you can find the 2006 BRR schedule at <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.brr-scca.org">http://www.brr-scca.org</a><!-- m -->

Click on the Events cone and then Current Autox Schedule

just gonna throw up the link to honda-tech..

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1490524">http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1490524</a><!-- m -->

What do you guys think is a fair asking price?

Check out the problem I'm having here:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=916555">http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=916555</a><!-- m -->

You don't have to sign up or post on the forum, you can leave me some feedback here if you have any 8)

Hey dave :lol:

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=981076&postid=19499428#19499428">http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=981 ... 8#19499428</a><!-- m -->

Quote:Not a honda but... 1992 Sentra SE-R

OK, the saga continues.... I need money! My new job isnt paying me my first check until the 19th and I have more bills than I care to think about. AHHHH Help me from Drowning!!

Car is located in Richmond,Va you can contact me at 804-874-3278, if I don't pick up leave a message. Here are the details

1992 sentra SE-R, kinda rare grey, 5-speed (LSD works, No 5th gear popout) cruise, no sunroof, no ABS, 134k miles.

Body- really good shape, couple minor dings really. paint faded on roof, hood and starting on right 1/4 panel. NO RUST! honestly 2nd best chassis I've ever owned (out of 7 SE-Rs I've owned, The other was a one owner garage king, I should have never sold it... I'll prob say that about this later on) two rather larger than normal dings on the roof. Hood is shiny and nice but has a couple indentions in it. I'm just being super picky!

Interior- On the verge of flawless. Driver seat bottom cushion has some sagging on the outside bolster, the seat is still in remarkable condition. The rest is in awsome shape.... very clean.

Engine/Trans- I purchased the car a month ago with a bad engine. I replaced it with a unknown mileage SR20 a friend had laying around. I replaced the front crank seal and cleaned the whole engine. It runs awsome, pulls hard, doesnt smoke, gets 30mpg on the highway. The only issue is it has a very light noise at about 2500rpm ONLY while free reving. I think its bottom end, my friends think its a lifter(s) on the top end. Its not loud, just there if you are outside the car. you can barely hear it if your listening for it at a complete stop. Only other issues are the exhaust gaskets need to be replaced in between the exhuast mani and the DP (about 8 bucks for new ring gaskets) and the rear exhaust section needs to be rewelded at the last joint, someone tried to and it looks like a retarded monkey tried doing it without using gas on the welder... very easy repair. The Clutch grabs great, no issues with the trans. The only mods are a poly front eng mount and a cone filter. This is as about as virgin a SE-R as you can find anymore.

I'm looking for $1500 for this with the other engine (Spun #4 bearing sitting in a parking lot). When I pulled the engine, it and the trans had NEVER been out of this car, every nissan wiring loom connector and zip tie was there.... Its been located in richmond since day one. Its had three owners before me, all in richmond. There is a auction with a bunch of hondas coming up at the 22nd of this month, so If you want it... I cannot sell it to you until the 21st as I use this to inspect houses. It will prob have another 1000 miles on it by then. I wouldnt hesitate to drive this car anywhere.

Oh, and the dark grey wheels on it dont' come with it. It comes with a set of 93 (shiney) wheels in perfect shape (no center caps sorry!)with 2 BFGs and 2 ES-100s with lots of tread. The only thing with the tires is one of the ES-100s has a soft sidewall... I'd guess it had been driven on low tire pressure.

btw, I will take a trade of a honda (pref accord) + cash
-Corey

If it wouldn't take a lot of work, could we change the color schemes? I know Honda-Tech has a choice of Blue or Gray. Could we have a few options, besides MM yellow?

wassup guys.....well so its been confirmed that we are riding this friday (jan 13th)..i have 9 confirmed riders.....lemme know what time suites u guys best....if you guys r in a mood for curvy roads we can go up on 33 or if u wanna just spread ur wings we can take off towards skyline drive....lemme know

All -
I upgraded the forum software this morning. Things are still a little off (ie - banner images and google ads) but should be returning to normal over the course of the day. Please let me know if you have any trouble.
-John C.

The internet really is serious fucking busines now.

<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html?part=rss&tag=6022491&subj=news">http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyan ... &subj=news</a><!-- m -->

Quote:Perspective: Create an e-annoyance, go to jail
By Declan McCullagh
Published: January 9, 2006, 4:00 AM PST

Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.

It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.

In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name. Thank Congress for small favors, I guess.

This ridiculous prohibition, which would likely imperil much of Usenet, is buried in the so-called Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Criminal penalties include stiff fines and two years in prison.

"The use of the word 'annoy' is particularly problematic," says Marv Johnson, legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union. "What's annoying to one person may not be annoying to someone else."
It's illegal to annoy

A new federal law states that when you annoy someone on the Internet, you must disclose your identity. Here's the relevant language.

"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

Buried deep in the new law is Sec. 113, an innocuously titled bit called "Preventing Cyberstalking." It rewrites existing telephone harassment law to prohibit anyone from using the Internet "without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy."

To grease the rails for this idea, Sen. Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican, and the section's other sponsors slipped it into an unrelated, must-pass bill to fund the Department of Justice. The plan: to make it politically infeasible for politicians to oppose the measure.

The tactic worked. The bill cleared the House of Representatives by voice vote, and the Senate unanimously approved it Dec. 16.

There's an interesting side note. An earlier version that the House approved in September had radically different wording. It was reasonable by comparison, and criminalized only using an "interactive computer service" to cause someone "substantial emotional harm."

That kind of prohibition might make sense. But why should merely annoying someone be illegal?

There are perfectly legitimate reasons to set up a Web site or write something incendiary without telling everyone exactly who you are.

Think about it: A woman fired by a manager who demanded sexual favors wants to blog about it without divulging her full name. An aspiring pundit hopes to set up the next Suck.com. A frustrated citizen wants to send e-mail describing corruption in local government without worrying about reprisals.

In each of those three cases, someone's probably going to be annoyed. That's enough to make the action a crime. (The Justice Department won't file charges in every case, of course, but trusting prosecutorial discretion is hardly reassuring.)

Clinton Fein, a San Francisco resident who runs the Annoy.com site, says a feature permitting visitors to send obnoxious and profane postcards through e-mail could be imperiled.

"Who decides what's annoying? That's the ultimate question," Fein said. He added: "If you send an annoying message via the United States Post Office, do you have to reveal your identity?"

Fein once sued to overturn part of the Communications Decency Act that outlawed transmitting indecent material "with intent to annoy." But the courts ruled the law applied only to obscene material, so Annoy.com didn't have to worry.

"I'm certainly not going to close the site down," Fein said on Friday. "I would fight it on First Amendment grounds."

He's right. Our esteemed politicians can't seem to grasp this simple point, but the First Amendment protects our right to write something that annoys someone else.

It even shields our right to do it anonymously. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas defended this principle magnificently in a 1995 case involving an Ohio woman who was punished for distributing anonymous political pamphlets.

If President Bush truly believed in the principle of limited government (it is in his official bio), he'd realize that the law he signed cannot be squared with the Constitution he swore to uphold.

And then he'd repeat what President Clinton did a decade ago when he felt compelled to sign a massive telecommunications law. Clinton realized that the section of the law punishing abortion-related material on the Internet was unconstitutional, and he directed the Justice Department not to enforce it.

Bush has the chance to show his respect for what he calls Americans' personal freedoms. Now we'll see if the president rises to the occasion.
Biography
Declan McCullagh is CNET News.com's Washington, D.C., correspondent. He chronicles the busy intersection between technology and politics. Before that, he worked for several years as Washington bureau chief for Wired News. He has also worked as a reporter for The Netly News, Time magazine and HotWired

Need some recommendations, there's just not a bunch of good ones. These are some I've come up with so far:
MM SE-R
MM B13
B13 SE-R
B13 TYPR

help me out guys, I'm registering it tomorow. If possible use: B13, SE-R, SR, SR20, or classic.
go here and click "create" to test your ideas: <!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="https://www.dmv.virginia.gov/dmvnet/plate_purchase/intro.asp">https://www.dmv.virginia.gov/dmvnet/pla ... /intro.asp</a><!-- m -->