Official MM Firearms Thread

[WRXtranceformed]

Do you feel the same way about the SAR? Or have you not had a chance to put it through paces. Just curious if you have shot it (I haven't)

I assume you mean the Tavor, and not the SAR-21 Goody was talking about. Some of the same considerations have to be given to the tavor, but the charging handle placement, safety, mag release all seem a little more well thought out. The ejection pattern of the Tavor is a little better, and a simple deflector will keep you from eating brass. The same would work for the AUG, except nobody really makes one that mounts with confidence. (They all "snap on" to the AUG body.) And oh man, the trigger on the Tavor is eleventy million times better than the AUG. The Aug has the worst trigger I've ever fired, and I've fired a NY legal Glock.

I'd also give a reliability nod to the Tavor, and it's definitely lighter and handier. 40 years of weapons development is nothing to sneeze at and the Tavor has been put through some harsh, harsh, bullshit and let's be honest: Fuckin' israelis gotta use 'em all the goddam time whereas when was the last time Austria went to war? Of all the bullpups available, the Tavor is definitely the best, followed by the F2000, then the AUG, BQZ, L85, SAR-21 and finally the Famas which is hot garbage. but give me the choice between, say, a KAC SR-15 11.5" SBR and anything on the above list and I'll take the Knights 10 times out of 10.

Correct I meant the Tavor. Yeah I figure if the IDF uses them there must be some truth behind the reviews. I know Gieselle and I think a few other companies have released trigger kits for them, so you could probably make them even better. A Tavor SAR with a factory 9mm conversion kit? Oh what fun :thumbup: