10-28-2015, 04:51 PM
Weren't we talking about this a little while ago? Can't remember if it was this thread or another, but it seems the invasion of privacy may become a concern with drones that is recognized by the court systems:
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.cnet.com/news/judge-rules-man-had-right-to-shoot-down-drone-over-his-house/">http://www.cnet.com/news/judge-rules-ma ... his-house/</a><!-- m -->
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://www.cnet.com/news/judge-rules-man-had-right-to-shoot-down-drone-over-his-house/">http://www.cnet.com/news/judge-rules-ma ... his-house/</a><!-- m -->
Posting in the banalist of threads since 2004
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks
2017 Mazda CX-5 GT AWD Premium
Past: 2016 GMC Canyon All Terrain Crew Cab / 2010 Jaguar XFR / 2012 Acura RDX AWD Tech / 2008 Cadillac CTS / 2007 Acura TL-S / 1966 5.0 HO Mustang Coupe
2001 Lexus IS300 / 2004 2.8L big turbo WRX STI / 2004 Subaru WRX / A couple of old trucks