11-30-2007, 12:46 AM
Steve85 Wrote:Mike Wrote:real estate is not a good investment
<!-- m --><a class="postlink" href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/real_estate/0704/gallery.stocks_v_realestate.moneymag/index.html">http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/rea ... index.html</a><!-- m -->
one thing they fail to mention is the liquidity of stocks versus a home.
I think a more realistic case where the investor, aka landlord, prices the property in-line with current values based on what home buyers are paying would have very different results.
yes. the results would be a house sitting unrented.
sellers dont set prices, buyers do.